So, I am at the Mid-Atlantic Congress with a slightly more reasonable schedule this time around and actually got got to sit in for part of a workshop or two… which was a blessing!
Late one afternoon, I am sitting in a workshop conducted by the the National Leadership Roundtable on Church Management which was discussing Ronald Heifetz’s work on adaptive leadership. (the speakers didn’t show the video, I just offered it as a short description to avoid a lot of technical narrative here.)
My collaborator, Margaret and I, were excited regarding hearing the information as we had already (without having the language) determined to go Beyond Boundaries and chose to Buy More and Build Something New as we reassess What We Do and where we might offer an appropriately chosen Nod. But following the breadcrumbs left behind of thought, I was reminded that it all led to a two year old post regarding Table Hopping in the Food Court/ So, let’s revisit it here with some hopeful since that we might rebuild upon it in time.
* * * * * * *
I’ve been thinking about this literally for months now… but only last Sunday began jotting notes down for this post last night.
I think most of us can acknowledge a need for a paradigm shift in Catholic youth ministry… And, for me, that might just begin with the metaphors we use. For example, it may be time to bury “the table” metaphor…
What’s that? It is the image we hold, consciously or not, that there is a common table that we are to share. We work industriously to gather many divergent voices to the table and/or go forth from the table in many different directions having found the common table serving as a source.
I’m beginning to think that it is an image that no longer serves us well. The table is often quite dependent on a sense of personality and hospitality of “the one” or “a few.” At the table, there is a presumption of leadership as influence or control. In the end, it develops a set of mores that risk dismissing or ignoring dissent within the culture.
The future of youth ministry can no longer be about the table… It must find itself within the food court… But, but, but, the food court is comprised of a whole bunch of tables… Exactly!
Last week, in Albuquerque, Father Alan Deck discussed cultural competency. He discussed how “either faith transforms culture or culture transforms faith” At the table, I think that the culture of the table has transformed how people perceive themselves while at the table (do I fit in?); who owns the table or even the doorways or access points to the table (who belongs here?); and what are the perceived manners/ appropriate actions around the table (what do we do here?) We develop a faith around the table and in the table itself.
But, Jesus, flipped all the table rules… washing feet, theologically redefining not the selections of the main course but the inconsequential standard everyday staples of bread and wine… The table is ingrained into our theologically sensibility, but we don’t seem to use it in the same manner Jesus did…
The Last Supper, powerful and lasting image that it was, however, was not the only table Jesus sat at. He sat with tax collectors and sinners. While at table, Mary scandalously washed his feet with her hair and perfume scented them. At the wedding feast, His Mother nagged him up from the table into chatting with the wine stewards.
Really, Jesus was a table-hopper.
Deck indicated that “Until culture is transformed, you have not evangelized.” We are not called to gather others to our table, but to go out, if not to all the nations, then, at least, to some of the other tables. We are called to follow the Master and to table hop!
But, it is absolutely impossible to do alone. We need others, and not in the “Hey, I’ll lead and you just follow along” mode. We need true partners and authentic collaborators…
Using a food court metaphor, we are called to recognize that there are numerous, almost countless tables, and an unmanageable amount of access points of entry. Some just pass through, while others visit briefly, and others are regulars. The hours of the food court, the transience of the people, the comings and goings all confound our ability to make it about our table and most especially about us.
If you need a scriptural reference, then lean towards the Loaves and Fishes. Look at all the players/partners involved in the story — Jesus, Phillip, Andrew, and (most especially) the kid smart enough to pack five barley loaves and two fish for a day trip. Attending is not a table of twelve, but a field of 5,000 or more. Jesus not only flips the rules of the table here; he expands our definition of a communal meal— one where the left-overs are greater than what was shared.
We desperately need a multitude of allies and approaches. There is no one method. What works for the table here may not work for the table over there nor the entry point back there.
“We used to think that the unity of the church was brought about by uniformity,” said Father Deck. “We know that it is actually found in our diversity.” Can we use the gift of our diversity to transform the food court-like culture around us? If the field of youth ministry is to grow, we must get up from “our” tables and recognize that we are to address the whole damn food court around us.
Still working these thoughts all out… your comments would be appreciated.
* * * * * * *
and they still are.
Scott, just thinking out loud and Matthew 16 and the “Food Court” of the journey. Your post speaks about Jesus being at different tables because he was “on the move”. anytime the apostles seem to get caught up in the dynamics of the table, meal, attendees, or left-overs, Jesus challenges them to meaning and source. ‘take heed and beware of the leaven’ (Matt 16-6) The Apostles want to transform the warning of Jesus into a material lesson on planning “It is because we have brought no bread”. For the apostles,it is about “the things of ministry” but the “table” Jesus set in the grassy hills was how ministry (teaching) can begin to find the limits of ministry, the “hunger” of the people and the compassion of Jesus and his challenges to the disciples to “give them something to eat”. A few paragraphs later at the mount of transifguration the pattern of the apostles shortfall is repeated when the “court of heaven” is opened up and Peter wants to construct the paradigm of “tent catechesis” when Jesus reprimands them “Arise and have no fear” and “tell no one of the vision until the son of man has been raised.” Jesus knows our faith is limited and developmental. Jesus takes us from “table to table” and moves us away from seeing only physical bread and grassy fields, cautions us away from the corruption of unbelief (the pharisees were always looking for signs)in order to lead us to the resurrection and the “court of heaven”. There is “food which you are not aware of” (John 4:31) and the “food which perishes not” (John 6:33) It was Jesus who showed us that moving from table to table (in faith) is the pardigm and having compassion on the crowds in light of the resurrection. If our ministry is not always “shifting towards heaven” in this pattern of trust, then having only one “paradigm” is the problem. The apostle were always challenged by Jesus calling them away from static patterns. To active, mobile ones. Keep up the good work!
Ron – In his Holy Thursday Chrism Mass homily in Rome, Pope Francis encouraged the priests to Go the the Outskirts and not just wait at the center table for all to come to our table http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-good-priest-can-be-recognized-in-his.html The words should speak to us as well.
A priest who seldom goes out of himself, who anoints little… misses out on the best of our people, on what can stir the depths of his priestly heart. Those who do not go out of themselves, instead of being mediators, gradually become intermediaries, managers. We know the difference: the intermediary, the manager, “has already received his reward”, and since he doesn’t put his own skin and his own heart on the line, he never hears a warm, heartfelt word of thanks. This is precisely the reason why some priests grow dissatisfied, become sad priests, lose heart and become in some sense collectors of antiques or novelties – instead of being shepherds living with “the smell of the sheep”, shepherds in the midst of their flock, fishers of men.
… Dear priests, may God the Father renew in us the Spirit of holiness with whom we have been anointed. May he renew his Spirit in our hearts, that this anointing may spread to everyone, even to those “outskirts” where our faithful people most look for it and most appreciate it. May our people sense that we are the Lord’s disciples; may they feel that their names are written upon our priestly vestments and that we seek no other identity; and may they receive through our words and deeds the oil of gladness which Jesus, the Anointed One, came to bring us.